Modern Day Magi

Now all has been heard; here is the conclusion of the matter: Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgment, including every hidden thing, whether it is good or evil. - Ecclesiastes 12:13-14............. Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true. - Acts 17:11

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Halloween is approaching...

Every October 31st in America, and around the world, children dress in ghoulish costumes and go "trick or treating" around their local neighborhoods. Thankfully this is not an Australian national practice although it is growing in popularity here.

Aside from the obvious Occultic symbolism of the tradition, the threat of "trick or treat", implying "give me some lollies or I will 'trick' you", is not an attitude which should be promoted in children.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a parent, I see nothing wrong with children dressing in costumes and having a neighborhood event. Giving a treat or lollies to the neighborhood children is fine. Halloween however celebrates much more than costumes and lollies.

Halloween's origins date back to the ancient Celtic festival of Samhain (pronounced sow-in).

The Celts, who lived 2,000 years ago in the area that is now Ireland, the United Kingdom, and northern France, celebrated their new year on November 1. This day marked the end of summer and the harvest and the beginning of the dark, cold winter, a time of year that was often associated with human death. Celts believed that on the night before the new year, the boundary between the worlds of the living and the dead became blurred. On the night of October 31, they celebrated Samhain, when it was believed that the ghosts of the dead returned to earth. In addition to causing trouble and damaging crops, Celts thought that the presence of the otherworldly spirits made it easier for the Druids, or Celtic priests, to make predictions about the future. For a people entirely dependent on the volatile natural world, these prophecies were an important source of comfort and direction during the long, dark winter.

To commemorate the event, Druids built huge sacred bonfires, where the people gathered to burn crops and animals as sacrifices to the Celtic deities.

During the celebration, the Celts wore costumes, typically consisting of animal heads and skins, and attempted to tell each other's fortunes. When the celebration was over, they re-lit their hearth fires, which they had extinguished earlier that evening, from the sacred bonfire to help protect them during the coming winter.

By A.D. 43, Romans had conquered the majority of Celtic territory. In the course of the four hundred years that they ruled the Celtic lands, two festivals of Roman origin were combined with the traditional Celtic celebration of Samhain.

The first was Feralia, a day in late October when the Romans traditionally commemorated the passing of the dead. The second was a day to honor Pomona, the Roman goddess of fruit and trees. The symbol of Pomona is the apple and the incorporation of this celebration into Samhain probably explains the tradition of "bobbing for apples" that is practiced today on Halloween.

By the 800s, the influence of Christianity had spread into Celtic lands. In the seventh century, Pope Boniface IV designated November 1 All Saints' Day, a time to honor saints and martyrs. It is widely believed today that the pope was attempting to replace the Celtic festival of the dead with a related, but church-sanctioned holiday. (Similar to the pagan origins of Easter). The celebration was also called All-hallows or All-hallowmas (from Middle English Alholowmesse meaning All Saints' Day) and the night before it, the night of Samhain, began to be called All-hallows Eve and, eventually, Halloween. Even later, in A.D. 1000, the church would make November 2 All Souls' Day, a day to honor the dead. It was celebrated similarly to Samhain, with big bonfires, parades, and dressing up in costumes as saints, angels, and devils. Together, the three celebrations, the eve of All Saints', All Saints', and All Souls', were called Hallowmas.

But now we come to an important Christian event we have on this same date.


Reformation Day commemorates a very important day which sparked very important events in Church History. Reformation Day commemorates the beginning of The Reformation.

On October 31 (which is also Halloween), 1517 Martin Luther nailed a proposal on the doors of a church in Wittenberg, Germany to debate the Catholic doctrine and practice of indulgences. In Latin Catholic theology, an indulgence is the remission granted by the Church of the temporal punishment due to sins already forgiven by God. Luther's proposal is more popularly known as the 95 Theses.

This was not an act of defiance or provocation as is sometimes thought. Since the Castle Church faced Wittenberg's main thoroughfare, the church door functioned as a public bulletin board and was therefore the logical place for posting important notices. The act of nailing a proposal to a public place, such as Luther did, was also common academic practice of the day and served as an invitation to debate. Nonetheless, the event created a controversy between Luther and those allied with the Pope over a variety of doctrines and practices. When Luther and his supporters were excommunicated in 1520, the Lutheran, Reformed and Anabaptist traditions were born.

While there were many issues and debates surrounding the Reformation, this day in 1517 and the posting of the 95 Thesis on the Church doors, is considered the event which began the Protestant Reformation.
_______________________________________________________

Click here to read the 95 Thesis.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

With The Australian Federal Election campaign in full swing, this video eases the tension with a little much needed humor.

Matthew 27 - Part 1

This chapter covers the end of Jesus' trial before Pilate, His execution and burial. Before that however we discover the end of Judas.

The description of Judas' death is a point of contention. Judas, racked with guilt hangs himself after returning the blood price of 30 silver coins (I'll get to the money in a moment). However, in Acts 1:18 it says "he fell headlong, his body burst open and all his intestines spilled out." This apparent contradiction, like all apparent contradictions in Scripture evaporates upon closer inspection.

Death by hanging is an extremely humane method of execution. Although rather grisly to witness (I imagine), hanging has a 'safety net' for the hangman. When a body falls with a noose around its neck the neck should snap causing a fairly swift death, if this fails to occur then the victim will suffocate anyway which may take a few agonizing minutes. Another and less common 'safety net' while being hung was to cut across the victim's stomach. This is so the jerk of dropping with a noose around ones neck will not only likely break the victim's neck, but also the victim will be disemboweled. A far quicker death than strangulation by the noose. Judas likely opened his own stomach in fear of the noose not doing its job and it being a slow death by strangulation.

During Jesus' trial before Pilate there are couple of details I want to mention.

Firstly Jesus does not answer to any of the false charges against Him, He only replies to truths. "...the governor asked him, "Are you the king of the Jews?"
"Yes, it is as you say," Jesus replied.
When he was accused by the chief priests and the elders, he gave no answer. Then Pilate asked him, "Don't you hear the testimony they are bringing against you?" But Jesus made no reply, not even to a single charge..." (Matthew 27:11-14).

Secondly Jesus is not condemned of ANY crime. He is the innocent Lamb, sacrificed for the guilty. Not only were the charges false, but they were not held against Him, yet He was executed anyway. Pilate knew that the Pharisees and Sadducees had personal and not just reasons for seeking Jesus death (Matthew 27:18) and also when Pilate asked what crime Jesus had committed they did not name a charge, but simply answered "Crucify Him!". (Matthew 27: 23)

Thirdly, and perhaps the most tragic is the response of the Jewish crowd to Jesus innocence. When Pilate washed his hands and said the famous words "I am innocent of this mans blood...All the people answered, "Let his blood be on us and on our children!" This is likely why the Jewish people have been so persecuted throughout history. Punishment for their total abandonment and betrayal of their Messiah.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Why does bad stuff happen to good people?

Yes that tired cliche. Why does bad stuff happen to good people?

Firstly I find the language of this question of itself problematic. If we go by the secular reasoning that most people are 'good' at least in some way, then we must also follow the relativistic approach to determining if something is 'good' or not. As relativism does not allow for any absolutes, nothing can ever be ruled out as purely bad. So everything must be at least a little bit good.

Eg. The person who has their car stolen is upset, stranded and out of pocket. - Bad outcomes.
However, the thief who steals a car is now able to sell it for money to use on something he/she wants or needs, or at least has fun driving really fast for a while. - Good outcomes.

So steering clear of that definition of 'good people' what am I left with?

Scripture tells us that "all have fallen short of the glory of God" and that "There is no one righteous, not even one" so no, one is 'good.'

Christians are however counted as righteous based on Christ's sacrifice, in spite of the fact that none of us are even remotely deserving of salvation. Hallelujah for Grace!

So I can define 'good people' as Christians, not good on our own but 'good' because of Christ.

Why then, does bad stuff happen to Christians?

Scripture says that "in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose." Now I believe this Scripture to be WAY over-quoted and misused. For starters people often ignore the last bit. What this verse says is that "If you are following the will of Jesus for your life, then even the trials will be beneficial." It does not say "Everything that happens is good, or will lead to something better in this life."

I do not subscribe to the idea that Jesus uses trails simply as 'character building' exercises for us. I can think of two reasons that our Sovereign Lord allows bad stuff to happen to His children.
1: To give us the opportunity to be able to relate to those around us who are hurting and suffering and in need of someone to share the Gospel to them. But more importantly need someone who understands their pain, and not someone who means well but just does not 'get it.' Jesus became a man to reveal Himself to mankind, to allow mankind to be able to relate to their Creator. God is no longer out of our reach and understanding, He became like us so we could come to Him. People who are suffering need people around them who are not only supportive, but who are also able to relate to their experiences. Ultimately this brings glory to Jesus by our testimonies of His faithfulness, strength, grace, patience, wisdom, comfort etc. in our own times of need.

2: To draw us closer to Him. If life was peachy all the time then who would need God? If life was always perfect then why would we need to rely on Him and live by Faith? As Christians we are to be in this world but not a part of it. The bad stuff of this world is to remind us just how much we need a Saviour and just how much we need Jesus in our lives. Ultimately this brings glory to Jesus by reminding Christians of His faithfulness, strength, grace, patience, wisdom, comfort etc. in our times of need.

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Matthew 26 - Part 2

Following on from my post on Matthew 26: 1-30:

Jesus predicts Peter's denial.
On the way to the garden, after finishing their passover meal (The Last Supper) Jesus tells the disciples "This very night you will all fall away on account of me, for it is written:
'I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will be scattered.'
But after I have risen, I will go ahead of you into Galilee." To which Peter denies. As with all of Jesus' prophesies, this one too comes to pass in spite of Peter's denial.

Jesus and the Disciples get to Gethsemane.
This passage has three points of note.
1) Here Jesus demonstrates the ultimate submission to His Father. Repeating the prayer "Not my will but yours..." Even into death, the horrible death Jesus knows is comming He submits in the perfect example of submission to the Will and Glory of the Father.
2) The disciples fail Jesus in His time of need. They fall asleep repeatedly when He asked them to keep watch in support of HIm. Even those closest to Jesus fell short of His request. This should encourage us in our failings, Jesus does not abandon or forsake them. He continues to encourage them and it is to these men He reveals Himself physically, after the reasurection.
3) Jesus was praying privately. This is an important example for a couple of reasons. Firstly it demonstrates clearly that there is a personal distinction between Jesus and the Father. (Hinting at the Trinity) This is not like the Lord's Prayer which was an exaple of prayer, this is actually Jesus praying to His Father. Also it demonstrates private prayer. Prayer should be private and personal, in worship and submission to God, not solely a corporate or public display. This does not mean never pray corporately, but just don't let that be the only time we pray.

We should be reminded that Jesus knew exactly what was happening, and in fact was in control of the whole situation.

Jesus betrayed and arrested.
One symbol of just how much of a perversion it is to turn ones back on Christ is the fact that He was betrayed with a kiss. A kiss is a sign of affection, loyalty, friendship, love, tenderness, care, protection, kindness, a greeting etc. A kiss should NEVER be about betrayal or abandonment.

Twice Jesus comments that His arrest is so that the "...Scriptures be fulfilled..." and "...that the writings of the prophets might be fulfilled." Reminding us that His betrayal, arrest, and sacrifice was all strictly according to His plan of salvation.

Jesus' trail with the Sanhedrin.
Many aspects about Jesus' trial is also very significant of the symbolism of the extent at which the Jewish nation had turned away from their Lord. Jesus was taken in the middle of the night to the home of Caiaphas for questioning. After Jesus' first does not answer to the testimony of false witness and the responds to their questions as to whether or not he claimed to be the Messiah, the scribes and priests hit Jesus in the face and spit on him in disgust.

This trial is outside Jewish law for several reasons:
1. It was illegal for the Sanhedrin to meet outside of the designated Chamber of Hewn Stone in the Temple, yet they met in Caiaphas' home.
2. The Sanhedrin had an express rule that it could not meet at night because justice must be carried out in the light of day, yet Jesus was tried at night.
3. The Sanhedrin, by law, was not allowed to originate charges. However, Jesus was first arrested, and then witnesses were looked for.
4. Jewish law says: "If a sentence of death is to be pronounced, it [a criminal case] cannot be concluded before the following day" (Mishna, "Sanhedrin" IV, 1). This was to allow sufficient opportunity for any witnesses in support of the accused to present themselves. However, Jesus' trial was conducted in private and completed in less than one day.
5. The merits of Jesus' defense were not considered. Deuteronomy 13:14 says "then you must inquire, probe and investigate it thoroughly. And if it is true and it has been proved..." yet, the court pronounced sentence instantly.

When taken before Pilate Jesus' crimes were switched the charges from blasphemy to treason before Pilate. Jesus' opponents wanted Him killed, but they did not want to do it themselves. So they charged Him with treason, a Roman crime, so the Romans would be responsible for His death. Again no evidence was presented (John 18:29-30). Pilate, after a brief interview, saw that Jesus was not guilty (John 18:38 & Matthew 27:18). Fearing the crowd, however, he allowed the crucifixion of an innocent man. Pilate did not even pronounce Jesus guilty; he merely turned Jesus over to the soldiers

Jesus not once admitted to any of the false charges brought before Him. He did not admit to blasphemy. Jesus only agreed and admitted the truth, that He IS the Messiah and that He IS the Son of God.

Peter's denial of Jesus.
Peter's denial of Jesus is one of the most famous scenes of Christianity. This should be an enormous encouragement for Christians of the faithfulness of Jesus in spite of our failings. Peter was one of Jesus closest friends and followers, one of the twelve and yet Peter betrayed Jesus. Christ's response (after Peter breaks down in repentance) is to take this simple man (an unlettered fisherman) and use him mightily in the early stages of the formation of the Christian church after Jesus' death and resurrection. Peter was a missionary to many lands and was used powerfully to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the early Christian world.

Just as Peter betrayed Jesus, repented and was then used for Jesus' glory so too can we be used in spite of our failings if we will repent and continually turn back to Jesus.

For more about the encouragement we can receive from and some great insight into the life and ministry of Peter (and a challenge to step even further) click on the following links.

Desiring to be Peter when the world needs Paul
Desiring to be Peter...