Why touch the hem of His cloak?
Why would the woman from Matthew 9:20-22 have touched the edge or hem Jesus' cloak for healing? Why not His sandal, or hand, or head, or...
The answer comes from a better understanding of what Jesus would actually have been wearing, and from Malachi 4.
The tallith or tallet(h), also called talles, is a prayer shawl "cloak" that is worn during the morning Jewish services (the Shacharit prayers) in Judaism. It has special twined and knotted "fringes" known as tzitzit attached to its four corners. The tzitzit is sometimes also referred to as the arba kanfot, meaning the ‘four wings’ .
Now let us look at Malachi 4:1-3 :
"Surely the day is coming; it will burn like a furnace. All the arrogant and every evildoer will be stubble, and that day that is coming will set them on fire," says the LORD Almighty. "Not a root or a branch will be left to them. But for you who revere my name, the sun of righteousness [Messiah] will rise with healing in its [His] wings [tzitzit]. And you will go out and leap like calves released from the stall. Then you will trample down the wicked; they will be ashes under the soles of your feet on the day when I do these things," says the LORD Almighty."
She touched His hem to fulfill this Messianic prophesey! She probably did not know that Jesus was the Messiah at the time and was acting upon some supposed 'magical' healing property she thought existed in His robe. If however she did know Jesus was the messiah and acted upon this prophesey deliberately then that is even more womderful.
10 Comments:
At 3/07/2006 08:58:00 am, Daniel said…
Good insight. It's also interesting that the woman's illness made her unclean according to the Torah. So anyone who touched her would thus become unclean. And how did Jesus heal her? With a touch.
At 3/07/2006 08:36:00 pm, Matthew Celestine said…
Thanks for the link and thanks for visiting my blog.
God Bless
Matthew
At 3/08/2006 05:39:00 am, Michael Pendleton said…
Off topic,
I completely and totaly agree with you on your comments for time. I also greatly appreciate you taking the time to read the post.
That post was part of a series of post. If you were to follow the thread I think you would be suprised exactly how much we are thinking alike!
Two Post on Time!
At 3/08/2006 06:20:00 am, Michael Pendleton said…
Off topic,
I read your comments on time again. I decided to link to your page. My next comments here will be on the subject.
You just don't know how "impressed"? (don't know what word I'm looking for) with your comments.
At 3/08/2006 09:58:00 am, Modern Day Magi said…
no worries michael and Dyspraxic Fundamentalist,
thanks for stoppong by.
MDM
At 3/08/2006 10:01:00 am, Modern Day Magi said…
daniel,
this is another example of Jesus sticking to what He said in Matt 9:12-13
On hearing this, Jesus said, "It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. But go and learn what this means: 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice. For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners."
At 3/09/2006 12:36:00 am, Gordon said…
Good stuff, here, MDM. I love all of the little nuances of the way Jesus fulfilled O.T. prophecies.
At 3/09/2006 12:34:00 pm, Curious Servant said…
Very interesting!
For many Christ followers we read that new testament passage and know that He was sensitive to the touch, not a tug on His clothing. That this was just a fringe on a shawl makes that even stronger.
At 3/30/2009 01:22:00 am, Anonymous said…
Better check your Hebrew. The Passage in Malachi refers to the כָּנָף [kanaph /kaw·nawf/] not the tzitzit. Brown-Driver-Briggs do indicate that כָּנָף can refer to the corner of a garment, however, it does not refer to the tassles. Sorry for the correction, but biblical accuracy is paramount.
Respectfully,
Louis
At 3/30/2009 02:53:00 pm, Modern Day Magi said…
Thanks Louis,
I was posting in regards to an article I had read, I am not familiar with Hebrew myself. Could it be the reference was to the corner of a garment and I made the extra stretch to the TziTzi.
Still the corner of the garment in mentioned here in is what was touched to provide the healing. The sentiment remains the same even though I confused one of the terms.
Yes Scriptural accuracy is paramount. Thanks again for the correction.
MDM
Post a Comment
<< Home