Modern Day Magi

Now all has been heard; here is the conclusion of the matter: Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgment, including every hidden thing, whether it is good or evil. - Ecclesiastes 12:13-14............. Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true. - Acts 17:11

Monday, March 13, 2006

Matthew chapter 11

Jesus talking about John.
Verses 1-18 have John the Baptist doubting that Jesus is really the Messiah and Jesus' response to him. At this stage John is in prison and sent his disciples to ask Jesus "Are you the one who was to come, or should we expect someone else?" Back in the desert, John had preached that the Jesus was the Messiah and that He would would baptize in the Spirit and fire, casting the wicked into a furnace of fire. John doubted because he expected, like most Jews, a different kind of Messiah. Jesus was not the political or military power that was expected and John's questions arose when he heard of Jesus' deeds, which were not those of a conqueroring warrior, but those of a humble servant. Thus when John asks if he and his disciples should look for someone else, this Greek expression is in an emphatic position and the specific term emphasizes "another of a different kind". John's expectations about the Messiah's future role were right; Jesus would baptize in fire, judging the world with justice and freeing the captives. But John did not understand that Jesus had another mission to complete before the coming judgment, the mission of the atonement of sin.
Jesus then endorses John in front of the crowds listening to Him teach, in spite of John's doubts. "I tell you [he is] more than a prophet...I tell you the truth: Among those born of women there has not risen anyone greater than John the Baptist; yet he who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he." When Jesus announces this, he is exalting the disciples, not minimizing John, JEsus already established that John was "more than a prophet"; he uses John for the comparison precisely because he is so significant in God's plan.

Tyre, Sidon and Sodom.
Jesus rebukes the cities of Korazin, Bethsaida and Capernaum because the people there did not repent when he travelled through them teaching and performing miracles. Jesus says that if Tyre, Sidon or even Sodom had seen such miracles even they would have repented from their wickedness. Jesus goes on to say that "it will be more bearable for Tyre and Sidon on the day of judgment than for you...it will be more bearable for Sodom on the day of judgment than for you." We know from Genesis19:1-29 that God utterly destroyed Sodom for its wickedness but what about Trye and Sidon? The Jews knew that the people of Sidon and Tyre were wicked and practiced idolitary and worshiped false gods. Jezebel, a princess from Tyre who became a consort of King Ahab and introduced to Israel, the worship of her gods.

Tyre and Sidon 101:
Tyre and Sidon were both cities founded by the Phonecians. The Phonecians were sea going merchants who had founded many powerful cities all around the Mediteranian, the most powerful of which was Carthage in northern Africa. The Phonecians lived in the promised land of Canan before the Israelites were given it by God and the people of the region called themselves the Canaani or Kenaani, the name Phoenicia became common thanks to the Greeks who called them the Phoiniki in reference to a particular Purple dye produced from secretions from the Spiny Dye-Murex, a marine snail. Sidon was older than Tyre and Tyre was actually a city founded by the people of Sidon, Isaiah refers to Tyre as the "Virgin Daughter of Sidon".
Isaiah 23 is prophecy about Tyre and its destruction. "For Tyre is destroyed and left without house or harbor." This was not accomplished until Alexander the Great and his army marched in 332 BC. Alexander was giving the peopleles he conquored 2 options
1. Assimilate into his empire.
2. Be destroyed utterly.
Tyre chose option 2. Tyre consisted of two distinct parts, a rocky fortress on the shore, called "Old Tyre", and the city, built on a small, fortified rocky island about 800 metres or half-a-mile from the shore. The people fled to their island for protection, but in responce to their 'defiance' Alexander's army spent 7 months tearing down "Old Tyre" and throwing all the rubble and materials into the ocean to build a great causeway (hence Tyre is destroyed and left without house or harbor) out to the island fortress which he breached in a matter of days. All the people were then killed or sold into slavery and disperced, the prophesey of Tyre had been fulfilled. Tyre was later rebuilt and a Church was founded there soon after the death of Stephen and the apostle Paul spent some time there as well. So the Jews would have known about the judgment Tyre faced as well, but what about Sidon?
Sidon received its name from the first-born son of Canaan, the grandson of Noah. Genesis 9:18-29 has a curse put on the decendants of Canan by Noah to ever be the lowliest of slaves to his brothers. Hence the history of Sidon has been to never be an independant state for too long. Sidon has had many conquerors: Philistines; Assyrians; Babylonians; Egyptians; Greeks and finally Romans in the years before Jesus. On December 4, 1110 Sidon was sacked in the First Crusade. During the Crusades it was sacked several times: it was finally destroyed by the Saracens in 1249. It became the centre of the Lordship of Sidon, an important seigneury in the Kingdom of Jerusalem. In 1260 it was again destroyed by the Mongols. The remains of the original walls are still visible.
After Sidon came under Ottoman Turkish rule in the seventeenth century, it regained a great deal of its earlier commercial importance. The Egyptians, assisted by England and France, captured and held the city in the nineteenth century. During WWI, the British took Sidon; after the war it became part of the French Protectorate, (a state protected and/or dominated by a foreign power) in the Eastern Mediterranean.
So even if we miss the references, the Jews listening to Jesus would not have. Tyre and Sidon were two cities in Canan whos people were destroyed and/or made slaves. By men instead of God, but still as part of God's judgment according to an Old Testament prophesey and a curse.

In effect, when Jesus says to the unrepentant cities "it will be more bearable for Tyre and Sidon on the day of judgment than for you...it will be more bearable for Sodom on the day of judgment than for you." He is really saying "Being unrepentant before the Day of Judgment is goibng to be far worse than being Destroyed by fire from heaven, put to the sword or sold into slavery."
Rest for the weary. (Matthew 11:25-30)
Just as Israel was wrongly secure in its status before God as above the Gentiles, so the wise and powerful failed to recognize that God favored the children, the meek. Jesus does not call the mighty or wise to follow him, but the humble laden with heavy burdens, the weary, like Israel in exile, who hope in God alone. They will find Jesus' yoke light because he is a Master who will care for them. Jesus' yoke is not lighter because he demands less, but because he bears more of the load with us. In contrast to unconcerned religious teachers who prided themselves on their own position, Jesus was going to lay down his life for the sheep.

10 Comments:

  • At 3/14/2006 04:37:00 am, Blogger Paul M. Kingery said…

    Dear Modern Day Magi,

    Thank you for your thoughts. I look forward to following your interesting blog. I have been studying and writing about the Land of Canaan with regard to the Christian future. You said God cursed the descendants of Canaan. I would urge you to look more closely at the scripture. Noah, in the style of patriarchs, prophesied of the curse on Canaan. The source was Ham's brothers, not God. This passage is a metaphor of Jesus revealing himself to us. He comes in a way we do not expect, in the flesh, in Jerusalem. His loving son sees the revelation of his body. In gladness and surprise he tells his brother. No harm in that. No sin in seeing Noah naked. Besides, God doesn't curse a man's son for his sin. The son does not bear the iniquity of the father. Shem and Japheth did two things wrong in their response to the revelation of God. They turned their faces backward, and they walked backward. They didn't expect Noah to show himself that way, so intimately, and didn't want others to see. The self-righteous ministers of our day, trusting in their own knowledge, expecting Jesus to come as a spirit in the sky, are rejecting his coming in the flesh, and are not preparing their flocks to be there waiting near Jerusalem when He comes. Jesus said he would not return to Jerusalem until its residents say "Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord." I have written on this subject recently. Are you interested in topics about the apocalypse, end times, the end of the world, eschatology, last days, the horsemen of the apocalypse, the beast, prophesy, prophesies, revelation, 666, bible prophesy, prophets, Canaan, Canaan's land, Land of Canaan, or the Christian future? If so you may enjoy reading " Land of Canaan." This is a free online book. The Link is http://landofcanaan.info/book.php
    Let me know what you think.

    Thanks,

    Paul M. Kingery, PhD, MPH

     
  • At 3/14/2006 06:51:00 am, Blogger Modern Day Magi said…

    Interesting line of thinking.
    I will read what you suggest when I get a chance (studying and 2 kids).
    There are a couple of things I dont quite get though, which will probably be explained better in your other writing.

    1. "He comes in a way we do not expect, in the flesh..."
    True that the Pharisees expected a different Messiah, a political or military power to liberate them. Jesus was unexpected in that He came as a humble servant willing to sacrifice Himself for His people.

    2. "His loving son sees the revelation of his body. In gladness and surprise he tells his brother. No harm in that. No sin in seeing Noah naked. Besides, God doesn't curse a man's son for his sin."
    While it is not wrong to have walked in on Noah and seen him naked. The sin came when instead of covering him, Ham went out to His brothers and advertised his fathers shame. Shem and Japheth, while they would not have sinned if they had walked in an seend Noah naked, what they did was right because they did not focus on Noah's shame, they covered him.

    3. "The son does not bear the iniquity of the father."
    Adam. We all bear the iniquity of his sin.

     
  • At 3/14/2006 10:17:00 am, Blogger Correy said…

    I really enjoyed this post. I always get amazed the John doubted that Jesus was the Christ.

    John was the last prophet of his time. I know of a few people who have been saved from his words regarding Jesus.

    "The Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world"

    One time spurgeon went into an empty hall and to test the accustics he yelled out this scripture and the cleaner heard this and was saved that instant.

    Your ending is good in whom Jesus came to save. Jesus yoke is light because he bares the load and we are called by the promose for Jesus has fullfilled the law and because we die and rise with him the Christian has fullfilled the law in Christ as well. Where is striving where is a heavy burden? It is gone.

    Good stuff.

     
  • At 3/14/2006 12:24:00 pm, Blogger Modern Day Magi said…

    I am studying to be a history teacher. I also have a love for classical history ie. Greek and Roman Era. One of my friends was reading Isaiah one day and knowing I am a history student asked if I had heard of Tyre. I proceded to tell Him of its destruction by Alexander the Great. He then opened his bible and showed me the verse "For Tyre is destroyed and left without house or harbor". Both my friend and I were amazed at the accuracy of this prophesey, it is truly a one sentence summary of what happened to Tyre, not figurative at all.
    If God is faithful to punish and show wrath where it is needed, how much more so will he show His love for those He calls His children?

     
  • At 3/14/2006 02:04:00 pm, Blogger Correy said…

    Magi:
    In response to Paul you wrote.
    "The son does not bear the iniquity of the father."
    Adam. We all bear the iniquity of his sin.


    It is good to correct the above thinking. It is the sinful nature we are born with not the burden or iniquity of Adams sin.

    ". . . through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned" No one will ever be guilty because of Adams sin nor will they ever bear Adams sin.

    and again...

    "The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin." Deuteronomy 24:16

    We are guilty because of our own sin and will be judged for our own sin. Unless they have already been judged and placed on another.

    Hope this helps. I would be very discerning with paul m. kingery

     
  • At 3/14/2006 02:36:00 pm, Blogger Modern Day Magi said…

    The iniquity of Adam caused / allowed sin to enter the world. Thus our sinful nature IS the weight of Adam's sin passed to us.
    1. We are guilty according to our own sin.
    2. We sin only beacues of our sinful nature.
    3. We have a sinful nature because of Adam's sin.

     
  • At 3/14/2006 09:32:00 pm, Blogger Michael Pendleton said…

    I don't think we have a sinful nature BECAUSE of Adams sin. Maybe you are not saying what you mean.

    Your first two points I think are correct but that third one needs rewording and/or rework.

     
  • At 3/14/2006 10:32:00 pm, Blogger Modern Day Magi said…

    When God created the world it was good. God did not create man with a sinful nature. Adam had the ability to sin, that is clear, but not the compulsion that we do, since we are bound as slaves to sin until set free.
    Adam and Eve sinned and the Human race fell from righteousness and were bound to the consequence of sin from that time on.
    Mankind was no longer immortal as we each had to pay the consequence of sin which is death, both physical and spiritual.
    You can say that it was part of Gods plan from the begining so that he could express His perfect love by becoming a sacrificial saviour, but our sinfulness is a direct result of the fall of man which is a direct result of Adam's sin. Even though this was God's plan, His plan still follows these steps.
    hence:
    We have a sinful nature because of Adam's sin.

     
  • At 3/14/2006 10:33:00 pm, Blogger Modern Day Magi said…

    thanks for questioning me michael.
    probing stimulates learning, if you stil think me wrong please dont hesitate to show me where/why.

    MDM

     
  • At 3/15/2006 04:07:00 pm, Blogger Correy said…

    Magi:
    Those 3 points are good. Man fell in Adam and because of this we are born with a sinful nature and are dead in sin and by nature children of wrath.

    Michael:
    What you perhaps meant to say is that we can't blame Adam because we have a sinful nature and this is true because all have sinned.

    It is us who sin and we can't say to the Lord well you made me like this or to Adam it is your fault. The scripture says we are without excuse.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home